Ryan Padget, President of IGEN. Ryan helps CFOs transform excise tax compliance from a back-office cost into a financial control advantage.
When finance leaders think about excise tax, the conversation often starts and ends with the tax team being a cost center that files the returns, meets the deadlines and avoids penalties. That framing is incorrect and increasingly risky. Every compliance decision can directly impact cash flow, margin preservation and forecast reliability.
Finance leaders who recognize this shift their perspective, and they treat excise tax as a financial control point that impacts cash flow and margin and poses real operational risks.
I’ve worked with organizations in some of the most complex industries, navigating everything from modernization to transformation over the course of my career. One common thread: The greatest financial risks were rarely found in the places executives were watching most closely. And I see that exact dynamic playing out in excise tax compliance.
Here’s my breakdown of what CFOs need to know to bridge the gap.
Where The Financial Exposure Actually Lives
Risks and opportunities show up in numerous ways in day-to-day compliance execution.
1. Unplanned Penalties And Interest
Late filings are often the result of small breakdowns across fragmented processes: a missed approval, an outdated filing calendar, a dependency that wasn’t visible until it was too late. In multi-jurisdiction environments, these small failures can compound quickly. What starts as a minor delay becomes recurring penalties and interest, all of which erode margin.
2. Unclaimed Exemptions And Credits
Excise tax is not only about what an organization owes. It’s also about what it’s entitled to recover. Collection allowances, administrative discounts, exemptions and jurisdiction-specific credits are often underutilized, especially in lean teams managing compliance across multiple states or product lines.
In a 2025 Grant Thornton CFO survey, only 54 % of finance leaders felt confident that their tax function understood how to capture new tax-saving opportunities under evolving tax law, highlighting that even strategic tax levers are often underleveraged. Teams either aren’t aware of all the opportunities, or they don’t have the time and resources to identify and validate them.
3. Hidden Working Capital Drag
When visibility is limited, finance teams naturally prioritize certainty. One common result is paying obligations earlier than necessary to avoid the risk of late filings.
That approach comes at a cost. Across dozens of jurisdictions and hundreds of filings, modest timing differences can reduce liquidity and create unnecessary pressure on working capital. These impacts rarely appear on a financial statement labeled as a compliance issue. Instead, they surface through tighter cash positions and more conservative forecasting assumptions.
The underlying cause is often a lack of confidence in compliance execution.
4. Lost Strategic Capacity
Many tax and finance professionals spend a disproportionate amount of time maintaining manual processes rather than driving financial outcomes. Data manipulation, spreadsheet maintenance, status tracking and approval follow-ups consume resources that could otherwise be directed toward planning, forecasting, risk modeling and tax optimization.
This is an efficiency problem as well as a resource allocation issue. Highly skilled professionals are spending time sustaining processes rather than generating strategic value.
Good Teams, Structural Limitations
Often the issue isn’t about tax talent; it’s about structural limitations. Many of the tools that support compliance, such as spreadsheets, shared calendars and email approvals, were not designed to serve as financial control systems. Yet that’s exactly how they’re being used. This creates fragmentation, reactivity, disconnect and weak controls.
As organizations scale—adding jurisdictions, entities and filing volume—these limitations persist and compound. The result: Compliance functions as a series of tasks to be completed, not a control layer that informs financial decision-making.
The Questions CFOs Should Be Asking
Because excise tax directly affects cash flow, profitability and financial predictability, it belongs in the CFO conversation.
Finance leaders should be asking:
• Where is compliance exposure today?
• How much recoverable value are we capturing, and how much are we missing?
• Do we have confidence in the timing and accuracy of our obligations?
• Are compliance-related risks visible before they impact financial results?
If the answers are unclear, there is likely a visibility gap that extends beyond the tax department.
Using Compliance Intelligence To Change The Equation
This is the gap compliance intelligence was built to close. With compliance intelligence, organizations can centralize compliance obligations and connect them to real-time financial exposure, transforming compliance from a reactive process into a proactive control system. (Disclosure: My company provides these solutions, as do others.)
However, one of the biggest mistakes I see organizations make is treating compliance as a technology problem before they fully understand it as an operational one. By the time compliance issues surface, they’re usually the result of years of accumulated workarounds: spreadsheets that became systems, manual reviews that became controls and institutional knowledge that never made it into a documented process. Many leaders are surprised by how much of their compliance operation depends on a handful of people holding things together behind the scenes.
Another common mistake is measuring success too narrowly. Compliance initiatives often get judged on whether a project was completed on time or whether a new system was implemented successfully. Those are important milestones, but they aren’t business outcomes.
The more important question is whether the organization has improved visibility into compliance risk, reduced unnecessary cash flow constraints, recovered value that was previously being missed or freed experienced tax and finance professionals to focus on higher-value work.
I’ve noticed the most successful organizations take a broader view of cost. The upfront investment in a new process or technology is easy to quantify. The ongoing cost of fragmented workflows, regulatory complexity and manual oversight is much harder to see because it’s distributed across teams and operating budgets. Over time, those hidden costs can become more significant than the original investment required to address them.
Perhaps the most difficult challenge is organizational alignment. Compliance touches finance, tax and operations, but ownership is often fragmented across all three.
Meaningful progress usually happens when the conversation moves beyond compliance mechanics and focuses on business outcomes, where finance can have greater control over outcomes and make performance more predictable, measurable and easier to stand behind.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
