Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UK financial watchdog has vowed to step up efforts to prevent customers being treated poorly by home and travel insurers, including a review of how they outsource claims to third-party intermediaries.
The Financial Conduct Authority on Thursday said it was “expanding the significant work we had planned to improve standards in the home and travel insurance markets” as it presented its formal response to a super-complaint submitted by Which?.
The consumer group accused the regulator of tolerating poor customer service by insurers and taking insufficient action for “too long”.
But the FCA rejected these claims, saying it had “acted quickly and proportionately to address issues with a range of tools”.
The watchdog revealed it had already taken enforcement and supervisory action against nine home and travel insurance providers, after an earlier review raised concerns about them. It stopped one company from doing business until its problems were fixed.
The FCA said it would expand its review of how insurers outsource claims to third-party intermediaries next year by looking into the way these outsourcers are paid and “how firms manage any resulting conflicts”.
The regulator also plans a new analysis of how insurers sell home and travel insurance. This will include an examination of the price comparison websites that many consumers use to buy such products and how they present quality ratings and other information.
Graeme Reynolds, director of competition and interim director of insurance at the FCA, told reporters that the work would lead to “solutions to address some of the information shortages in the market” including through greater use of artificial intelligence technology.
Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which?, said the group was “pleased that the FCA has taken our concerns seriously”.
The actions “must be the first step towards fundamental reform to ensure these markets work better for consumers”, said Concha, adding that Which? would “hold the regulator to account to ensure it acts with urgency”.
The FCA said 79 per cent of people who made an insurance claim were satisfied with how it was handled, but added that there was “room for improvement — with three in 10 saying there isn’t enough information to judge the quality of different policies”.
An earlier review of home and travel insurance completed by the FCA this year found “examples of poor oversight of outsourced claims handlers and insufficient monitoring of management information which could also be inadequate”.
The watchdog since said it had opened two enforcement investigations, commissioned independent reviews of three insurers’ claims handling systems and controls and required three senior managers to commit to strengthen their systems and controls.
Hannah Gurga, director-general of the Association of British Insurers, said the trade body looked “forward to working closely with Which?, the FCA and wider industry to build on the progress already made, strengthen trust in our sector, and ensure people get the help they need when it matters most”.
Some consumer groups were not satisfied with the regulator’s response to the super-complaint, a mechanism giving designated consumer groups the statutory power to raise issues they believe are damaging to customers.
Fairer Finance head James Daley said the FCA’s plans were “unlikely to be sufficient to get to grips with the many and growing problems in this sector”.
“The insurance market is caught in a race to the bottom on price — leading to the hollowing out of products, as well as poorer claims experiences,” he added.
Additional reporting by Lee Harris
