Armstrong, K. & Asch, D. A. Bridging polarization in medicine—from biology to social causes. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 888–889 (2020).
Oberlander, J. Polarization, partisanship, and health in the United States. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 49, 329–350 (2024).
Merriam-Webster. Polarization. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polarization?utm_campaign=sd&utm_medium=serp&utm_source=jsonld (2024).
Van Bavel, J. J. et al. The costs of polarizing a pandemic: antecedents, consequences, and lessons. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231190395 (2023).
Wallace, J., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. & Schwartz, J. L. Excess death rates for republican and democratic registered voters in florida and ohio during the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Intern. Med. 183, 916–923 (2023).
Wróblewski, M. & Meler, A. Political polarization may affect attitudes towards vaccination. An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries. Eur. J. Public Health 34, 375–379 (2024).
Pacheco, J., Gollust, S. E., Callaghan, T. & Motta, M. A call for measuring partisanship in US public health research. Am. J. Public Health 114, 772–776 (2024).
Marmot, M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet Lond. Engl. 365, 1099–1104 (2005).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html (2023).
World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health (2024).
Case, A. & Deaton, A. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).
King, L., Scheiring, G. & Nosrati, E. Deaths of despair in comparative perspective. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 48, 299–317 (2022).
Montez, J. K. et al. US state policy contexts and mortality of working-age adults. PLoS ONE 17, e0275466 (2022).
Heller, J. C., Givens, M. L., Johnson, S. P. & Kindig, D. A. Keeping it political and powerful: defining the structural determinants of health. Milbank Q 102, 351–366 (2024).
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. Pandemic Politics: the Deadly Toll of Partisanship in the Age of COVID (Princeton Univ. Press, 2022).
Hetherington, M. J. & Rudolph, T. J. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2015).
Lee, A. H. Y. Social trust in polarized times: How perceptions of political polarization affect Americans’ trust in each other. Polit. Behav. 44, 1533–1554 (2022).
Grumbach, J. M. From backwaters to major policymakers: policy polarization in the states, 1970–2014. Perspect. Polit. 16, 416–435 (2018).
Lelkes, Y. Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements. Public Opin. Q. 80, 392–410 (2016).
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 22, 129–146 (2019).
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J. & Bryson, B. Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Am. J. Sociol. 102, 690–755 (1996).
Baldassarri, D. & Gelman, A. Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. AJS 114, 408–446 (2008).
Fiorina, M. P. & Abrams, S. J. Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11, 563–588 (2008).
Shor, B. & McCarty, N. Two decades of polarization in American state legislatures. J. Political Inst. Political Econ. 3, 343–370 (2022).
Hetherington, M. J. Review article: putting polarization in perspective. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39, 413–448 (2009).
Lees, J. & Cikara, M. Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 279–286 (2020).
Ruggeri, K. et al. The general fault in our fault lines. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1369–1380 (2021).
Iyengar, S., Sood, G. & Lelkes, Y. Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opin. Q. 76, 405–431 (2012).
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (eds. Austin, W.G. & Worchel, S.) 33–37 (Brooks/Cole, 1979).
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. M. Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Rev. Econ. Stat. 106, 557–565 (2024).
Patkós, V. Measuring partisan polarization with partisan differences in satisfaction with the government: the introduction of a new comparative approach. Qual. Quant. 57, 39–57 (2023).
Chen, M. K. & Rohla, R. The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science 360, 1020–1024 (2018).
Mason, L. A cross-cutting calm: how social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opin. Q. 80, 351–377 (2016).
Lerman, A. E., Sadin, M. L. & Trachtman, S. Policy uptake as political behavior: evidence from the affordable care act. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 111, 755–770 (2017).
Fraser, T., Aldrich, D. P., Panagopoulos, C., Hummel, D. & Kim, D. The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health. PNAS Nexus 1, pgac011 (2022).
Trachtman, S. Polarization, participation, and premiums: how political behavior helps explain where the ACA works, and where It doesn’t. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 44, 855–884 (2019).
Oliver, D. David Oliver: Social media’s false polarisation is no good for balanced NHS discussion. BMJ 384, q147 (2024).
National Research Council (US) & Institute of Medicine (US). US Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health (National Academies Press, 2013).
Schieber, G. J., Poullier, J.-P. & Greenwald, L. M. Health system performance in OECD countries, 1980–1992. Health Aff. 13, 100–112 (1994).
Montez, J. K. Policy polarization and death in the United States. Temple Law Rev. 92, 889–916 (2020).
Montez, J. K. US State polarization, policymaking power, and population health. Milbank Q 98, 1033–1052 (2020).
Pomeranz, J. L. & Pertschuk, M. State preemption: a significant and quiet threat to public health in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 107, 900–902 (2017).
Florina, M. P. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (Yale Univ. Press, 1981).
Bartels, L. M. Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 24, 117–150 (2002).
Leeper, T. J. The informational basis for mass polarization. Public Opin. Q. 78, 27–46 (2014).
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M. & Ryan, J. B. Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 28–38 (2021).
Baum, M. A. Red state, blue state, flu state: media self-selection and partisan gaps in swine flu vaccinations. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 36, 1021–1059 (2011).
Sances, M. W. & Clinton, J. D. Who participated in the ACA? gains in insurance coverage by political partisanship. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 44, 349–379 (2019).
Kim, S. E. & Pelc, K. Taking one for the (other) team: does political diversity lower vaccination uptake? Polit. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09932-y (2024).
Nayak, S. S., Fraser, T., Panagopoulos, C., Aldrich, D. P. & Kim, D. Is divisive politics making Americans sick? Associations of perceived partisan polarization with physical and mental health outcomes among adults in the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 284, 113976 (2021).
Arbatli, E. & Rosenberg, D. United we stand, divided we rule: how political polarization erodes democracy. Democratization 28, 285–307 (2021).
Iyengar, S. & Westwood, S. J. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59, 690–707 (2015).
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L. & Luke, R. E. Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies. Democratization 28, 929–948 (2021).
Warren, M. E. Democracy and Trust (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).
Van Bavel, J. J. et al. Political psychology in the digital (mis) information age: a model of news belief and sharing. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 15, 84–113 (2021).
Pereira, A., Harris, E. & Van Bavel, J. J. Identity concerns drive belief: the impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 26, 24–47 (2023).
Van Bavel, J. J. & Pereira, A. The partisan brain: an identity-based model of political belief. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 213–224 (2018).
Kim, Y. & Kim, Y. How affective polarization deepens the partisan divide in US cable news use: exploring the mediating role of partisans’ bias blind spots in media credibility judgment. J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000414 (2024).
Jenke, L. Affective polarization and misinformation belief. Polit. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w (2023).
Rathje, S. et al. Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 892–903 (2023).
Kahan, D. M. Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition. Cultural Cognition Project working paper series no. 164, Yale Law School, Public Law research paper no. 605, Yale Law & Economics research paper no. 575. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067 (2017).
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J. & van der Linden, S. Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 892–903 (2023).
Van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Vlasceanu, M. & Pretus, C. Updating the identity-based model of belief: from false belief to the spread of misinformation. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 56, 101787 (2024).
Huber, M., Boven, L. V., Park, B. & Pizzi, W. T. Seeing red: anger increases how much republican identification predicts partisan attitudes and perceived polarization. PLoS ONE 10, e0139193 (2015).
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W. & Pepinsky, T. B. Trump support explains COVID-19 health behaviors in the United States. Public Opin. Q. 88, 161–174 (2024).
Postill, J. Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media Cult. Soc. 40, 754–765 (2018).
Lasco, G. Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic. Glob. Public Health 15, 1417–1429 (2020).
Charron, N., Lapuente, V. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. Uncooperative society, uncooperative politics or both? Trust, polarization, populism and COVID-19 deaths across European regions. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 62, 781–805 (2023).
Speed, E. & Mannion, R. Populism and health policy: three international case studies of right-wing populist policy frames. Sociol. Health Illn. 42, 1967–1981 (2020).
Evans, J. H. & Hargittai, E. Who doesn’t trust Fauci? The public’s belief in the expertise and shared values of scientists in the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius 6, 2378023120947337 (2020).
Reed, C. Why so many people have had enough of experts—and how to win back trust. The Conversation https://theconversation.com/why-so-many-people-have-had-enough-of-experts-and-how-to-win-back-trust-206134 (28 June 2023).
Canineu, M. L. and Munoz, C. The toll of Bolsonaro’s disastrous COVID-19 response. Human Rights Watch https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/10/27/toll-bolsonaros-disastrous-covid-19-response (27 October 2021).
Hegland, A., Zhang, A. L., Zichettella, B. & Pasek, J. A partisan pandemic: how COVID-19 was primed for polarization. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 700, 55–72 (2022).
Dyer, O. Measles outbreak in Somali American community follows anti-vaccine talks. BMJ 357, j2378 (2017).
Center for Countering Digital Hate. The disinformation dozen. CCDH https://counterhate.com/research/the-disinformation-dozen/ (24 March 2021).
Rathje, S., He, J. K., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J. & van der Linden, S. Social media behavior is associated with vaccine hesitancy. PNAS Nexus 1, pgac207 (2022).
Phadke, V. K., Bednarczyk, R. A. & Omer, S. B. Vaccine refusal and measles outbreaks in the US. JAMA 324, 1344–1345 (2020).
Hotez, P. J., Nuzhath, T. & Colwell, B. Combating vaccine hesitancy and other 21st century social determinants in the global fight against measles. Curr. Opin. Virol. 41, 1–7 (2020).
Wong, C. Measles outbreaks cause alarm: what the data say. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00265-8 (2024).
Simchon, A., Brady, W. A. & Van Bavel, J. J. The language of online polarization. PNAS Nexus 1, pgac019 (2022).
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S. & Hertwig, R. A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 74–101 (2022).
Williams, J. H., Hooker, C., Gilbert, G. L., Hor, S. & Degeling, C. Disagreement among experts about public health decision making: is it polarisation and does it matter? BMJ Glob. Health 8, e011182 (2023).
Levin, J. M., Bukowski, L. A., Minson, J. A. & Kahn, J. M. The political polarization of COVID-19 treatments among physicians and laypeople in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216179120 (2023).
Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J. & Weisberg, M. Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Underst. Sci. 30, 120–138 (2021).
Fischhoff, B. & Davis, A. L. Communicating scientific uncertainty. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13664–13671 (2014).
Nagler, R. H., Gollust, S. E., Yzer, M. C., Vogel, R. I. & Rothman, A. J. Sustaining positive perceptions of science in the face of conflicting health information: an experimental test of messages about the process of scientific discovery. Soc. Sci. Med. 334, 116194 (2023).
Dries, C., McDowell, M., Rebitschek, F. G. & Leuker, C. When evidence changes: communicating uncertainty protects against a loss of trust. Public Underst. Sci. 33, 777–794 (2024).
Gretton, J. D., Meyers, E. A., Walker, A. C., Fugelsang, J. A. & Koehler, D. J. A brief forewarning intervention overcomes negative effects of salient changes in COVID-19 guidance. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 16, 1549–1574 (2021).
Kreps, S. E. & Kriner, D. L. Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd4563 (2020).
Galston, W. A. For COVID-19 vaccinations, party affiliation matters more than race and ethnicity. Brookings https://www.brookings.edu/articles/for-covid-19-vaccinations-party-affiliation-matters-more-than-race-and-ethnicity/ (1 October 2021).
Gollwitzer, A. et al. Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1186–1197 (2020).
Golos, A. M., Hopkins, D. J., Bhanot, S. P. & Buttenheim, A. M. Partisanship, messaging, and the COVID-19 vaccine: evidence from survey experiments. Am. J. Health Promot. 36, 602–611 (2022).
Allcott, H. et al. Polarization and public health: partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. J. Public Econ. 191, 104254 (2020).
Lang, J., Erickson, W. W. & Jing-Schmidt, Z. #MaskOn! #MaskOff! Digital polarization of mask-wearing in the United States during COVID-19. PLoS ONE 16, e0250817 (2021).
Backhaus, I., Hoven, H. & Kawachi, I. Far-right political ideology and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: multilevel analysis of 21 European countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 335, 116227 (2023).
Allen, J., Watts, D. J. & Rand, D. G. Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook. Science 384, eadk3451 (2024).
Schumpe, B. M. et al. Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data. Sci. Rep. 12, 3824 (2022).
Singh, H., Dahiya, N., Yadav, M. & Sehrawat, N. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 new variants and their clinical significance. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 7336309 (2022).
Pei, S., Kandula, S. & Shaman, J. Differential effects of intervention timing on COVID-19 spread in the United States. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd6370 (2020).
Van Bavel, J. J. et al. National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. Nat. Commun. 13, 517 (2022).
Argote, P. et al. The shot, the message, and the messenger: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Latin America. NPJ Vaccines 6, 118 (2021).
Larsen, B. J. et al. Counter-stereotypical messaging and partisan cues: moving the needle on vaccines in a polarized United States. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg9434 (2023).
Findling, M. G., Blendon, R. J. & Benson, J. M. Polarized public opinion about public health during the COVID-19 pandemic: political divides and future implications. JAMA Health Forum 3, e220016– (2022).
Del Ponte, A., Gerber, A. S. & Patashnik, E. M. Polarization, the pandemic, and public trust in health system actors. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 49, 375–401 (2024).
Ruggeri, K. et al. Behavioural interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy driven by misinformation on social media. BMJ 384, e076542 (2024).
Merkley, E. et al. A rare moment of cross-partisan consensus: elite and public response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 53, 311–318 (2020).
Bilinski, A. & Emanuel, E. J. COVID-19 and excess all-cause mortality in the US and 18 comparison countries. JAMA 324, 2100–2102 (2020).
Schiavo, R. Health Communication: from Theory to Practice (Jossey-Bass, 2013).
Zhao, R., Lu, X., Yang, J. & Li, B. Understanding the Impact of communicating uncertainty about COVID-19 in the news: randomized between-subjects factorial experiment. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e51910 (2024).
Hargan, E. D. Setting expectations for the federal role in public health emergencies. J. Law. Med. Ethics 36, 8–12 (2008).
Ranade, S., Brown, J. B., Freeman, T. & Thind, A. Enacting care by being experts and managing relationships: a discourse analysis of chief medical officer of health media briefings during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM Qual. Res. Health 3, 100208 (2023).
Kelly, H. From TV to TikTok, how we get the news is changing fast. Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/15/news-trends-social/ (15 November 2023).
Van Bavel, J. J. et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 460–471 (2020).
Pink, S. L., Chu, J., Druckman, J. N., Rand, D. G. & Willer, R. Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106559118 (2021).
Chu, J., Pink, S. L. & Willer, R. Religious identity cues increase vaccination intentions and trust in medical experts among American Christians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106481118 (2021).
Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. Americans’ trust in scientists, other groups declines. Pew Research Center https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/ (15 February 2022).
Bartoš, V., Bauer, M., Cahlíková, J. & Chytilová, J. Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 606, 542–549 (2022).
Većkalov, B. et al. A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2 (2024).
Zhang, F. J. Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-19. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 696–706 (2023).
Van Bavel, J. & Packer, D. The Power of us: Harnessing our Shared Identities to Improve Performance, Increase Cooperation, and Promote Social Harmony (Little, Brown Spark, 2021).
Garamone, J. Almost all active duty service members receive vaccines. U.S. Department of Defense https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2877173/almost-all-active-duty-service-members-receive-vaccines/ (16 December 2021).
Posner, L. COVID-19 and the world’s militaries. Think Global Health https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/covid-19-and-worlds-militaries (25 January 2022).
Moehring, A. et al. Providing normative information increases intentions to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat. Commun. 14, 126 (2023).
Pretus, C. et al. The Misleading count: an identity-based intervention to counter partisan misinformation sharing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 379, 20230040 (2024).
Dean, N. Tracking COVID-19 infections: time for change. Nature 602, 185 (2022).
Facher, L. GOP opposition to vaccine mandates extends far beyond COVID-19. STAT https://www.statnews.com/2021/11/17/gop-opposition-to-vaccine-mandates-extends-far-beyond-covid-19/ (17 November 2021).
Jones, J. M. Far fewer in US regard childhood vaccinations as important. Gallup https://news.gallup.com/poll/648308/far-fewer-regard-childhood-vaccinations-important.aspx (7 August 2024).
Karlsen, G. H. Divide and rule: ten lessons about Russian political influence activities in Europe. Palgrave Commun. 5, 19 (2019).
Wilson, S. L. & Wiysonge, C. Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Glob. Health 5, e004206 (2020).
Kirk, K. How Russia sows confusion in the US vaccine debate. FP https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/09/in-the-united-states-russian-trolls-are-peddling-measles-disinformation-on-twitter/ (9 April 2024).
Moucheraud, C., Guo, H. & Macinko, J. Trust in governments and health workers low globally, influencing attitudes toward health information, vaccines. Health Aff. 40, 1215–1224 (2021).
Yuan, X., Schuchard, R. J. & Crooks, A. T. Examining emergent communities and social bots within the polarized online vaccination debate in Twitter. Soc. Media Soc. 5, 2056305119865465 (2019).
Finkel, E. J. et al. Political sectarianism in America. Science 370, 533–536 (2020).
